Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CreatorChapouthie, Georges
Date2011-02-01
Date Accessioned2025-06-10T18:54:46Z
Date Available2025-06-10T18:54:46Z
URL de acceso al recursohttps://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/v2-n1-chapouthie
URL de acceso al recurso10.5565/rev/da.195
Identifier (URI)http://revistas.suiiurisasociacion.com/xmlui/handle/123456789/22880
DescriptionIn this article, Professor Georges Chapouthier describes the three main concepts that have, in the past and today, defined the relationship of human beings towards animals: animals perceived as human beings, animals regarded as objects and animals understood as sentient beings. The only philosophical stance that is sustainable today is to consider animals as sentient beings that are related to human beings, but not totally identical to them. The recognition of sensitivity in animals leads to mankind’s obligation to grant them some fundamental rights on a philosophical and juridical level.en-US
DescriptionEn este artículo, el Prof.Georges Chapouthier describe las tres grandes concepciones que, en el plano ético han permitido a lo largo de la historia –y siguen permitiendo- a nuestra especie encarar las relaciones con las otras especies animales, tales como el “animal humanizado”, el “animal objeto” o el “animal-ser sensible”. La única postura filosóficamente sostenible hoy en día , según el autor, es la del animal como ser sensible, pariente del hombre mas sin ser idéntico a él. Reconocer a los animales una sensibilidad próxima a la nuestra conduce también a tratarlos adecuadamente, tanto ética como jurídicamente.es-ES
DescriptionIn this article, Professor Georges Chapouthier describes the three main concepts that have, in the past and today, defined the relationship of human beings towards animals: animals perceived as human beings, animals regarded as objects and animals understood as sentient beings. The only philosophical stance that is sustainable today is to consider animals as sentient beings that are related to human beings, but not totally identical to them. The recognition of sensitivity in animals leads to mankind’s obligation to grant them some fundamental rights on a philosophical and juridical level.fr-CA
Item Formatapplication/pdf
Item Languagefra
PublisherUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelonaes-ES
xmlui.metadata.dc.relationhttps://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/v2-n1-chapouthie/194
RightsDerechos de autor 2011 Georges Chapouthiees-ES
Rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0es-ES
SourceDerecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies; Vol. 2 No 1 (2011); 1-3ca-ES
SourceDerecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2011); 1-3en-US
SourceDerecho Animal. Forum of Animal Law Studies; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2011); 1-3es-ES
Source2462-7518
TitleTrois chemins éthiques de l’homme à l’animalen-US
TitleTrois chemins éthiques de l’homme à l’animales-ES
TitleTrois chemins éthiques de l’homme à l’animalfr-CA
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem